Home

Reading Comprehension

Full exam practice — highest difficulty, 20 marks across all question types

20 marks · 500–600 words passages · AI-generated

Practice 1 of 60

Section B

The House That Was Not Mine To Return To

Refer to Text 2 to answer Questions 5–14. Answer in your own words as far as possible.

1I had carried, for twenty years, the address of the house I was born in, the way a person carries a stone in a pocket they have sewn shut — not because the stone is useful, but because the carrying has, by the twentieth year, become inseparable from the shape of the hand that carries it, and the inseparability is the thing that makes the stone, in its uselessness, impossible to set down, and the impossibility was, I now understand, the thing that brought me, in the fortieth year of my exile, back to the street I had, in the leaving, sworn I would never see again.

1–7

2The street was narrower than I remembered, or my memory had, in the twenty years, widened it to accommodate the weight I had, in my absence, given it, and the narrowing was the first of many corrections the return imposed on the house I had, in my mind, been living in — the house of memory was larger, warmer, better lit than the house of mortar, and the gap between the two was the thing I had, for twenty years, refused to measure, because measuring would have required me to admit that the home I mourned was a home I had, in the mourning, constructed, and the construction was the thing the return, in its plainness, finally forced me to face.

8–14

3The door was the colour it had never been — a green I did not recognise, painted, no doubt, by the family who had, in the years after our leaving, made the house their own, and the green was, I want to be honest, the thing that most undid me, because the door of my memory was the blue my father had chosen the year I was born, and the blue had, in my memory, been the threshold of every homecoming I had, in my exile, imagined, and the green was the proof that the homecoming I had imagined was, in its imagining, a return to a house that no longer existed, and which had, perhaps, never existed in the way I had, in my longing, required it to.

15–22

4A child opened the door, and the child's face was, in its openness, the thing my father's face had been in the photograph I carried — the photograph was the only thing I had brought from the house, and the photograph had, in the twenty years, become more real to me than the father it depicted, and the child's face, in its resemblance to the photograph, was the thing that made me understand, with the slow, vertiginous clarity of a person finally seeing the ground beneath a floor they had believed solid, that I had not, in twenty years, been mourning a place but mourning a version of a place that the place itself had, in its continuing, moved beyond, and the moving-beyond was the thing the return made visible, and the visibility was the thing I had, in the carrying, most feared.

23–29

5I did not tell the child who I was, and the not-telling was, I now see, the only honest thing the return permitted, because telling would have required the child to do the thing the return had, in its honesty, already refused to ask of me — to reconcile the stranger at the door with the house the stranger had, in her father's stories, perhaps been a figure in, and the reconciliation was, I understood, not the child's work but mine, and mine was the work of accepting that the house had, in its twenty years, become a house that did not require my return, and that the not-requiring was not a rejection but the plain, irreversible fact of a life that had, in my absence, continued, and the continuing was the thing the stone in my pocket had, all along, been refusing to acknowledge.

30–36

6I walked, after, through the street I had, in my memory, walked a thousand times, and the walking was, I want to be honest, a walk through a place that was and was not the place I remembered — the bakery was a pharmacy, the stone where I had cut my knee was buried under new paving, the tree my brother had climbed had been felled to widen the road, and each correction was, I now see, a small death of a part of the memory I had, in the carrying, kept alive, and the small deaths accumulated, through the walk, into the thing I had, in twenty years, most successfully avoided — the understanding that the home I had been mourning was a home the street had, in its living, buried, and that my mourning was, in its persistence, a mourning not of the place but of the self I had been in the place, and that self was the thing no return could recover, because the self, like the street, had moved on.

37–43

7I left, in the end, without entering the house, and the leaving-without-entering was, I have come to believe, the truest homecoming the return allowed, because the entering would have required me to do the thing the walk had already made impossible — to sit in the rooms and pretend the house was the house I had remembered, and the pretending would have been the thing the twenty years of carrying had, in their honesty, finally exhausted me of, and the exhaustion was, I now understand, the thing the return had, in its painful mercy, been designed to produce, because the return was not, in the end, a return to a place but a return to the fact of having left, and the fact was the thing I had, in the carrying of the stone, spent twenty years not facing.

44–50

8I took the stone, that evening, from my pocket, and held it in the palm of my hand, and the holding was, for the first time, a holding without the weight, because the weight had, in the return, been transferred from the stone to the understanding — the understanding that the home I had carried was a home I had, in the carrying, built, and that the building was the thing the exile had required of me, and that the setting-down was not a betrayal of the home but the only honest way, at last, to honour it, because a home carried as a stone is a home a person cannot live in, and a home a person cannot live in is, in the end, not a home but a weight.

51–55

9I left the stone on the wall across from the green door, and the leaving was, I have come to believe, the first honest act of the twenty years, because the leaving was the thing that finally separated the memory from the carrying, and the separation was the thing that allowed me, for the first time, to remember the house without the weight, and the remembering without the weight was, I now see, the only form the homecoming could, in the end, take.

56–59

Section A [20 marks]

Refer to the passage and answer all questions.

5From paragraph 1, explain what the writer means by carrying the address 'the way a person carries a stone in a pocket they have sewn shut'.

[1]

6'the home I mourned was a home I had, in the mourning, constructed' (line 13).

(a) What does the writer mean by this?

[1]

(b) Explain why the return forced him to face this. Answer in your own words as far as possible.

[2]

7Which word in paragraph 3 suggests the green door was proof that the homecoming the writer imagined was a return to a house that no longer existed?

[1]

8For each of the following expressions from the passage, explain what it suggests. Answer in your own words as far as possible.

ExpressionWhat it suggests
the slow, vertiginous clarity of a person finally seeing the ground beneath a floor they had believed solid (lines 26–27)
the house had, in its twenty years, become a house that did not require my return (line 34)
[2]

9In paragraph 6, explain how the language used conveys how the walk through the street killed parts of the writer's memory. Support your ideas with three details from the paragraph.

Use three details from paragraph 6.

[3]

10'the leaving-without-entering was... the truest homecoming the return allowed' (lines 44–45).

(a) Why was leaving without entering the 'truest homecoming'?

[1]

(b) Explain the paradox of a homecoming that does not involve entering. Answer in your own words as far as possible.

[2]

11From paragraph 8, explain what the writer means by 'a home carried as a stone is a home a person cannot live in'.

[1]

12With reference to paragraph 7,

(a) explain what the writer means by 'the return was not, in the end, a return to a place but a return to the fact of having left'.

[1]

(b) Quote the phrase that describes what the writer spent twenty years not facing.

[1]

13What does the writer suggest by leaving the stone on the wall across from the green door (paragraph 9)?

[2]

14The structure of the text reflects the writer's reckoning with his remembered home. Complete the flow chart by choosing one phrase from the box to summarise the main stage in each part of the text. There are some extra phrases in the box which you do not need to use.

The stages

The stonethe narrowingThe green doorthe small deathsThe leavingthe setting-downThe lessonThe regret
Paragraph 1: (i))
The stone
Paragraph 2–3: (i))
Paragraph 4–6: (ii))
Paragraph 7: (iii))
Paragraph 8–9: (iv))
[4]